Ali Wise, former Dolce & Gabbana publicist, is a total stalker. Allegedly.
She was charged Monday with four counts of computer trespass, eavesdropping, computer tampering in the fourth degree, aggravated harassment in the second degree, and one count of stalking in the fourth degree.
Wise used a software called SpoofCard to hack into voicemails over 1,000 times between April 2006 and June 2009. Among the personal lives Wise hacked into is that of interior designer Nina Freudenberger, who Wise suspected was getting cozy with her ex Jason Pomeranc. A friend of Wise said the previously successful publicist has been using SpoofCard “forever to find out about her ex’s new girls. She hacks in to voice-mails, MySpace and Facebook accounts, e-mails … you name it.” And we wonder why guys aren’t inviting us to their apartments…
Ali Wise wore a black overcoat and Louboutins to court this week. Her dignity may be gone, but her classic fashion sense is still in tact. At least.
She’s due back to court in January.
i love ali wiser she is so damn hot and cool. and now a super sexy detective. note to readers: do not believe the Post they lie obviously and do not fact check; this story is one sided. she did not know spoof card was illegal and nina freudenberg is a total stalker allegedly according to pomerance in page six but again cant believe what you read.
From another web just found interesting….”I am going to go out on a limb and defend my friend Al Wise. Ali is not the jealous mean girl being portrayed in the Post and the zealous tabloid press. Ali would never intentionally break the law. Her actions could be described as compulsive but in this digital world many girls and guys I know do similar things. The Spoof Card happens to be illegal and Ali would have never used it in this way, especially so many times, had she known this. I saw the complaint and no where does it mention “other women” or “love rivals”. So I do not understand where the press gets these facts? One girl’s name has been mentioned in the complaint and it has been highly publicized that there was a silly cat fight and what this other girl did to Ali and Jason was just as intrusive if not intentionally malicious. Ali allegedly used the card 700 times over a 4 year period, it is excessive, but it does not warrant Felony Charges in my opinion. Ali is being made a public example to prove new technology laws. Invasion of privacy, yes, but she did not knowingly break the law. There was no intent to commit fraud or harm. Anyone that KNOWS Ali, adores her. She is funny, smart, pretty, vivacious and guys have always LOVED her. Guys have been obsessed with her to the point where her friends jokingly ask Ali advice on how she make guys fall so hard! Ali could write the book! So it is strange to people that know her intimately to see her being portrayed so inaccurately. It just shows us the new media manipulates everything and even if her actions speak otherwise to an outsider, her intentions do not line up with the perception being reiterated. Ali is human and made a mistake, many- and I will not defend that part. The tabloid press is mean-spirited and they don’t fact check. They are jealous of a girl like Ali that they perceive to “have it all”- they want to rip her to shreds and with great pleasure. Sadly, this should not be front page news and if she wasn’t a well known pretty girl with high profile relationships and jobs this would not be newsworthy. Both Josh Deutsch and Jason Pomeranc , her ex-boyfriends, are still supporting her and they know her better than anyone else.
So in the end the people who love her showing their support speaks infinitely about Ali’s character. It is ironic that Ali is being portrayed as the “scorned lover” or the “crazy girl”, I realize the facts (even skewed) without knowing Ali, out of context, could be perceived wrongly – but it is just not the case. Ali is not malicious or a “stalker” (please)- and i speak on behalf of many of her friends and colleagues who love her and will continue to support during this difficult time. We all hope she has strength to hold her head up high and know this too shall pass”
The writer doesn’t appear to know what a SpoofCard is. She referred to it as “software”. It’s not. It’s a phone card you can purchase. With it, you can use it to fake your CID, use computer-generated male or female voices.
I’ve been the victim of it before, used to harass and intimidate. Someone used it with me to use a false CID and leave harassing messages.
You don’t use it to hack into voicemail accounts, unless you already KNOW someone’s passcodes so that you can enter that account, and THEn maybe you’d use the card to make it appear as if the VICTIM were accessing the account when they actually weren’t. Maybe THAT’S what was meant by the author. At the least, the author didn’t read whatever information she had very well, or that information wasn’t very accurate to begin with.
Unfortunately, these companies keep popping up in larger numbers, and there has been NO legislation to prevent their use, and people constantly use these things to harass.
I stand corrected! Apparently in recent times comes now something called the “SpoofApp”, for use on things like Blackberries…and which IS designed to work like the SpoodCard! (sigh) That’s just wrong. Why does it get EASIER to harass, and not the other way around? Where are the legal protections against innocent people who end up the harassed VICTIMS of devices and software succh as this?