Oh Man, Someone Photoshopped Kate Middleton To Look Skinnier

Posted by , on May 6, 2011 at 2:34 pm

Is nothing sacred people? Not even an already teeny tiny princess? The Daily Mail via Jezebel is reporting that Kate Middleton‘s corset-cinched-sized waist has been made even smaller on the cover of Grazia.

Also, her left arm is really just her right arm copied, because, you know, Will was standing there in the original photo. Grazia is denying they did anything to Kate to make her look smaller, saying via a rep, Grazia takes the issue of women’s body image very seriously. No changes whatsoever were made to the image of the Duchess with the purpose or effect of making her appear slimmer.” It’s difficult to believe this when there’s photographic evidence to the contrary.

The now Duchess actually just looks weird even smaller, almost freakish. So props to 24-inch waists, but 20-inch waists might just be going too far.


Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Comments

  1. gina says:

    very tan too

  2. Cookie says:

    dreadful job Grazia – fire your retouchers, she looks lopsided…I’m surprised someone signed off on this – I would be shot if I did such a crummy job.

  3. Sam says:

    “her left arm is really just her right arm copied, because, you know, Will was standing there in the original photo.”

    You have that backwards. William is standing on her right side and holding her right hand so if any arm had been copied it would have to be her left otherwise both hands would be up in the air.

  4. Deborah Scott says:

    I’m not sure they INTENTIONALLY photoshopped her to make her look slimmer. Looking at the picture, I think what they did was when they cropped off her LEFT arm they also took off part of her breast and waist, flipped the image and pasted them on her right side (poor William). Because of the angle of how she is standing, this made her waist look smaller. You can tell this is what they did when you look through her veil that is draped down behind her and see the same background image. Also, they took off part of her bouquet as well to paste onto the final picture.

  5. Frank N. Blunt says:

    Just another wasted use of a tree much less recycled tripe from perps that shouldn’t be given any regard for what spews out of their mouths much less the offenses they make to the written word and the damage that they do to objective, honest, & responsible journalism. As a matter of fact, they do enough to distinguish themselves from such.

  6. ian234 says:

    did u really go to journalism school to gossip about kate middleton? really? what a sad, sad waste. maybe theres still time to get a real job.

  7. Rex Remes says:

    Why do people even care about anything to do with the royal fam?

    Oh … Deborah scott’s post is spot on.

  8. Renmenw says:

    LMAO at the person who realized you got the arms wrong! Sometimes comments sections are golden.

  9. Doof says:

    I’m pretty sure it’s not intentional, just really, really bad work. When they flipped her left arm, they flipped the empty space, as well. You can see next to her right side that the gown on her hip/butt suddenly disappears behind her “arm.”

  10. Gracie's studio says:

    I measured the waist in each photo and they are exactly the same. They changed shading with creates an illusion.